Accidents and Injuries Happen...
They Get Resolved Here.

Serious Impairment I

The Minor Injury Regulation, excludes musculoskeletal injuries that do not result in serious impairment.  In Sparrowhawk v Zapoltinski (2012) A.J. No. 54(Q.B.)(Q.L.), Justice Shelley analyzed the phrase “serious impairment” and “substantial inability” in the Minor Injury Regulation and wrote as follows:

Serious Impairment

B.The Injury Caused Serious Impairment

96     The MIR excludes as minor injuries any injury that causes “serious impairment”. Evaluation of serious impairment has five steps:

  • whether a physical or cognitive function is impaired;
  • whether a sprain, strain, or WAD injury is “the primary factor contributing to the impairment”;
  • does the impairment cause substantial inability to perform:
  • a) essential work tasks,
  • b) essential facets of training or education, or
  • c) “normal activities of the claimant’s daily living”;
  • whether the impairment has been “ongoing since the accident”; and
  • whether the impairment is not expected to “improve substantially”.

113     I conclude that “substantial inability” exists where an injury:

  • prevents an injured person from engaging in a “normal activity of daily living”,
  • impedes an injured person’s engaging in a “normal activity of daily living” to a degree that is non-trivial for that person,
  • does not impede an injured person from engaging in a “normal activity of daily living” but that activity is associated with pain or other discomforting effects such that engaging in the activity diminishes the injured person’s enjoyment of life.

This analysis clearly opens up the door for chronic musculoskeletal pain cases. Musculoskeletal pain qualifies as a “sprain, strain or whiplash associated disorder” under the Minor Injury Regulations. However, if the musculoskeletal pain becomes chronic, it is, by definition, not a minor injury.  This is because it results in serious impairment as it interferes with normal activities of daily living (NADL). It may “prevent” engagement in NADL’S  or “impede” one from engaging in NADL’S to a degree that is non-trivial for that person.  This is both a subjective and objective test. An injury may also not impede with NADL’S but can result in diminished enjoyment of life.  A functional capacity evaluation will assist in proving your musculoskeletal injury is not, by definition, minor.

Written by Joseph A. Nagy,
Edmonton Injury Lawyer
Joseph A. Nagy Injury Law, Edmonton Injury Lawyer

My name is Joseph A. Nagy. I am an Edmonton personal injury lawyer. I provide injury law services to people who have been injured in motor vehicle accidents in Edmonton and throughout central and Northern Alberta. I have successfully resolved thousands of personal injury cases. If you have suffered a personal injury and need the help of a proven, experienced personal injury lawyer, I invite you to request a free consultation. 

Recent Posts

AllInjury Law

What Is No-Fault Insurance?

March 2, 2023

Updated March 2, 2023 What Is No-Fault Insurance? Definition No-fault insurance is...


To Stop a Thief – What Could Go Wrong?

February 14, 2023

To Stop a Thief – What Could Go Wrong? D’Andrea v Economical...


Patel v Certas Direct Insurance Co., [2020] A.J. No. 793

August 31, 2020

In this Application for a Section 581 advance, there are two significantly...


A Summary of the Law on Section 581 Advances

August 14, 2020

A Summary of the Law on Section 581 Advances Section 581 of...


Choosing an Alberta Injury Lawyer

April 22, 2019

Choosing an Alberta Injury Lawyer Choosing the right Alberta injury lawyer can...


The 5 Most Common Driving Behaviors That Lead to Motor Vehicle Accidents

November 16, 2018

Today I would like to discuss the 5 most common driving behaviours...

Scroll to Top

Book Your Free Consultation

Personal Injury Glossary Comments